Skip to content
On this page Definition

Atlas · DS144 · Layout: Two-Dimensional Spatial

Spatial Dashboard

Indicators are placed on maps or operation sites.

  • Status in 2026: Active. In current use.
  • Trend 2027 to 2030: Steady (an editorial projection, not a forecast).
  • The term: Known technical term or standard.

Definition

Indicators are placed on maps or operation sites.

Traits

  • map
  • overlays
  • zones

Typical settings: IoT, logistics, cities.

When to use it, and when not

Consider it when the task and motivation match: geographic and logistics operators. Typical settings: iot, logistics, cities.

Be careful when the risk below would hurt the main task: spatial context becomes decoration.

UX risk and how to reduce it

Risk: Spatial context becomes decoration.

Mitigation and accessibility: Tie position to real data.

How to check: Test a prototype against a plain baseline on a real task: completion, time, errors, comprehension, accessibility and preference, segmented by context rather than by stereotype.

Evidence

Indirect: the sources support underlying principles, not a preference for this style.

The sources below support the principles that apply to this term. None of them shows that this style works better or is preferred.

Heuristic scales

Relative editorial judgements from 1 to 5. They are not results of a study and not a measure of quality.

Visual complexity heuristic
4 / 5 (1 is few visual elements, 5 is many layered elements)
Expressiveness heuristic
3 / 5 (1 is restrained, neutral, 5 is highly expressive)
Information density heuristic
4 / 5 (1 is sparse, 5 is dense)

In our library

No design-style recipe in @codeatlasdev/ui implements this term yet. You can still build it from the --ca-* tokens: see Theming.

Prompt for your AI

Paste this into a coding agent. It carries the trade-offs, and asks for a baseline to compare against.

Design this interface in the "Spatial Dashboard" direction (layout, two-dimensional spatial): Indicators are placed on maps or operation sites.
Visual and interaction traits to use: map, overlays, zones.
Main UX risk: Spatial context becomes decoration. Mitigate it: Tie position to real data.
Keep it accessible to WCAG 2.2 AA: contrast, visible focus, keyboard operation, 24 px minimum targets, reflow at 320 CSS px and reduced motion.
Keep the content, hierarchy and behavior the same as a plain baseline so the two can be compared. Do not claim the style performs better; the choice should be validated with users.

References

  1. Wagemans, Elder, Kubovy, Palmer, Peterson, Singh, von der Heydt (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6).Established

    Supports: A review of the grouping principles (proximity, similarity, common fate and others) and of figure-ground organization in contemporary perception research.

    Does not support: Any claim about interface styles. It is a review of perception, not of screens, and says nothing about preference.

    Checked 2026-10-25.

  2. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (2021). WCAG 2 supplemental guidance. W3C WAI.Standard or guideline

    Supports: W3C WAI lists supplemental guidance for improving accessibility beyond what WCAG 2 requires, including a cognitive accessibility guidance set.

    Does not support: Normative requirements: supplemental guidance is advisory, not required for conformance. This page is an index; a specific recommendation needs the linked document.

    Checked 2026-10-25.