Skip to content
On this page Definition

Atlas · DS191 · Interaction pattern: Collaboration

Presence-Aware UI

Signals showing who is present and which element they are working on.

  • Status in 2026: Established. Documented and in wide use.
  • Trend 2027 to 2030: Rising (an editorial projection, not a forecast).
  • The term: Known technical term or standard.

Definition

Signals showing who is present and which element they are working on.

Traits

  • remote cursors
  • viewing indicators

Typical settings: Collaborative apps.

When to use it, and when not

Consider it when the task and motivation match: distributed teams. Typical settings: collaborative apps.

Be careful when the risk below would hurt the main task: personal data or noise.

UX risk and how to reduce it

Risk: Personal data or noise.

Mitigation and accessibility: Presence and privacy controls.

How to check: Test a prototype against a plain baseline on a real task: completion, time, errors, comprehension, accessibility and preference, segmented by context rather than by stereotype.

Evidence

Indirect: the sources support underlying principles, not a preference for this style.

The sources below support the principles that apply to this term. None of them shows that this style works better or is preferred.

Heuristic scales

Relative editorial judgements from 1 to 5. They are not results of a study and not a measure of quality.

Visual complexity heuristic
3 / 5 (1 is few visual elements, 5 is many layered elements)
Expressiveness heuristic
2 / 5 (1 is restrained, neutral, 5 is highly expressive)
Information density heuristic
4 / 5 (1 is sparse, 5 is dense)

In our library

No design-style recipe in @codeatlasdev/ui implements this term yet. You can still build it from the --ca-* tokens: see Theming.

Prompt for your AI

Paste this into a coding agent. It carries the trade-offs, and asks for a baseline to compare against.

Design this interface in the "Presence-Aware UI" direction (interaction pattern, collaboration): Signals showing who is present and which element they are working on.
Visual and interaction traits to use: remote cursors, viewing indicators.
Main UX risk: Personal data or noise. Mitigate it: Presence and privacy controls.
Keep it accessible to WCAG 2.2 AA: contrast, visible focus, keyboard operation, 24 px minimum targets, reflow at 320 CSS px and reduced motion.
Keep the content, hierarchy and behavior the same as a plain baseline so the two can be compared. Do not claim the style performs better; the choice should be validated with users.

References

  1. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (2021). WCAG 2 supplemental guidance. W3C WAI.Standard or guideline

    Supports: W3C WAI lists supplemental guidance for improving accessibility beyond what WCAG 2 requires, including a cognitive accessibility guidance set.

    Does not support: Normative requirements: supplemental guidance is advisory, not required for conformance. This page is an index; a specific recommendation needs the linked document.

    Checked 2026-10-25.

  2. Hassenzahl (2004). The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4).Supported

    Supports: Two studies with four MP3-player skins: goodness depended on perceived usability and hedonic attributes, while beauty largely depended on identification, a hedonic attribute. Beauty and goodness were related but not the same.

    Does not support: Results for other products, tasks or populations. The products were four skins of one kind of player.

    Checked 2026-10-25.